Control through Parliamentary Committees in India

Learning Outcomes:

1. Understand the mechanisms of accountability provided by parliamentary committees.
2. Analyze the specific roles of different types of parliamentary committees.
3. Examine the influence and scope of committee actions in the Indian governance structure.
4. Evaluate the effectiveness of parliamentary committees in ensuring transparency and control.

Parliamentary committees play an essential role in a functioning democracy, providing oversight, accountability, and detailed scrutiny of executive actions. In India, these committees form the backbone of parliamentary control over the executive, ensuring that government policies and administration are examined in a structured manner. Through a system of thorough investigations, hearings, and reports, parliamentary committees help in improving the quality of governance. These committees bridge the gap between the parliament and the executive by providing informed inputs on legislative matters and by checking executive power.

Parliamentary Committees: A Mechanism of Control

Parliamentary committees act as a tool for legislative control over the executive by scrutinizing its actions and policies. There are several ways in which these committees help ensure accountability and transparency within India’s governance structure. Below is a detailed look into how parliamentary committees operate as an accountability mechanism.

1. Detailed scrutiny of executive actions: Parliamentary committees investigate actions taken by the executive, going into minute details that would otherwise not be possible during the regular parliamentary debates. They have the advantage of time, expertise, and access to relevant documents, which allows them to conduct a detailed review.

2. Reduction in executive dominance: In parliamentary democracies like India, the executive, due to its majority in the legislature, often dominates legislative discussions. Parliamentary committees reduce this dominance by ensuring that discussions are fact-based and policy-focused, minimizing the influence of party politics.

3. Non-partisan nature: Committees work through consensus, which ensures that discussions are not as polarized as they might be in the broader legislative assembly. This enhances the ability of the committee to function impartially and focus on public welfare rather than political gains.

4. Direct questioning of civil servants: Parliamentary committees have the authority to summon civil servants and other officials for questioning. This allows for direct accountability of bureaucrats for their actions and the implementation of policies. These committees can demand explanations for administrative decisions and seek clarification on policies.

5. Assistance in drafting informed legislation: Parliamentary committees help improve the quality of legislation by examining bills in detail, suggesting amendments, and offering recommendations. This process ensures that bills are well-thought-out and are based on sound research rather than rushed political motivations.

Important Note: The process of bill scrutiny through committees is one of the most critical aspects of legislative efficiency in India.

Types of Parliamentary Committees in India

The Indian parliamentary system consists of several types of committees, each serving distinct functions in governance. They can broadly be categorized into Standing Committees and Ad Hoc Committees, with further subdivisions based on their responsibilities.

1. Standing Committees: These are permanent committees that are reconstituted every year or periodically and have a defined role in parliamentary functions. Their permanent nature allows them to build expertise in their areas of focus.
   ●

   Public Accounts Committee (PAC): PAC scrutinizes the annual financial accounts and audit reports of the government. It examines whether public funds have been used efficiently and in accordance with the laws and regulations.

   ●

   Estimates Committee: This committee examines how well the funds authorized by the parliament are being used, scrutinizing whether economic allocations are serving their intended purposes.

   ●

   Committee on Public Undertakings (COPU): COPU scrutinizes the working of public sector enterprises, ensuring they are functioning efficiently and serving public interests.

2. Ad Hoc Committees: These are temporary committees formed for specific tasks and are dissolved once the task is completed.
   ●

   Select Committees on Bills: These committees are constituted for examining particular bills in detail and suggest amendments. They enable specialized scrutiny that cannot be performed in the general sessions of parliament.

   ●

   Joint Parliamentary Committees (JPCs): These are formed to tackle major controversies or issues of national importance. JPCs can be instrumental in addressing public scandals and crises, providing a mechanism for investigation and policy correction.

Important Concept: Standing Committees help institutionalize control mechanisms, whereas Ad Hoc Committees focus on immediate issues, making both essential to a balanced system.

Role of Parliamentary Committees in Ensuring Accountability

The functioning of parliamentary committees is critical in ensuring the executive remains accountable. This accountability is achieved through various processes:

1. Annual Reports and Audits: Committees such as the PAC review audit reports prepared by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). They ensure that discrepancies in the financial conduct of government departments are investigated, and corrective measures are recommended.

2. Budgetary Oversight: Committees examine various aspects of budget proposals, ensuring that government expenditure is justifiable and that public money is being allocated effectively. Through careful scrutiny, committees ensure that policies are financially sound.

3. Post-legislative Scrutiny: Committees often assess the performance of laws after they have been enacted. This scrutiny helps determine whether laws are achieving their intended goals and whether amendments are required.

4. Ministerial Responsibility: Committees also ensure that ministers are accountable to the parliament by regularly questioning their actions and policies. Ministerial responsibility is central to parliamentary democracy, and committees are crucial in ensuring ministers answer to the people’s representatives.

Process Flow: Bill → Review by Committee → Amendments → Reintroduction in Parliament → Approval by Parliament

Parliamentary Committees and Governance Reforms

Committees not only serve as watchdogs but also suggest significant governance reforms. Their recommendations have often led to changes in policies and administration.

1. Improvement of public sector efficiency: Committees like COPU play a crucial role in suggesting reforms that improve the efficiency and productivity of public sector enterprises, ensuring that these enterprises align with broader national interests.

2. Legislative efficiency: The recommendations of committees like the Estimates Committee ensure that the government’s policies are grounded in economic realities, leading to more efficient and practical governance.

3. Anti-corruption measures: Committees can highlight cases of maladministration and corruption, which can lead to significant policy changes and accountability measures, including prosecution or administrative reforms.

Comparative Overview of Parliamentary Committees’ Roles

Important Note: Committees are vital in balancing the executive’s powers and providing expert recommendations on governance.

Challenges and Recommendations

Despite their critical role, parliamentary committees face several challenges in performing their functions effectively.

1. Limited time and resources: Committees often have a significant workload, which may limit the depth of their scrutiny. This problem can be exacerbated by limited access to specialized resources and expert opinions.

2. Non-binding recommendations: The recommendations made by committees are not legally binding, which can limit their impact. Governments may choose to ignore or delay the implementation of committee recommendations, weakening their effectiveness.

3. Partisan interests: While committees strive for non-partisanship, political interests can sometimes influence the decision-making process, reducing their effectiveness in providing unbiased oversight.

4. Lack of follow-up: Although committees present reports with recommendations, there is often inadequate follow-up, reducing the long-term impact of their work. More structured mechanisms for ensuring the implementation of recommendations would improve governance outcomes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, parliamentary committees are indispensable to ensuring accountability, transparency, and efficiency in governance. By scrutinizing policies, holding the executive accountable, and suggesting reforms, they ensure that democracy functions in the best interests of the public.

MCQ: Which of the following committees is responsible for examining public expenditure?
A) Estimates Committee
B) Committee on Public Undertakings
C) Public Accounts Committee
D) Joint Parliamentary Committee
Answer: C